Forget about a Vettel era, it’s Nando time baby!…because Schumi showed the way.

Posted: January 13, 2012 by thevillainf1 in F1 Addicts Anonymous, Insights

I’m surely not the first one to notice this, but as I’m struggling through the off season while watching my collection of season reviews-  from the 70s to 2010-  one thing struck me in particular: the uncanny similarities in the careers of Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso.
They both impressed right from their debut races. Schumacher took the F1 world by storm by qualifying an impressive 7th in the fairly competitive Jordan at Spa. Alonso, though at the back of the field, still managed to impress in the uncompetitive Minardi by qualifying a whopping 2.6 seconds clear of his teammate Tarso Marques on his debut. Granted, Marques was woefully off the pace there but Alonso also beat a Prost and a Jaguar to line up 19th in his first race and straight away the F1 world started noticing the young Spaniard.
While Schumacher went straight to Bennetton after only one race for Jordan, Alonso had to sit out a full year with Minardi at the back of the grid, and then some time on the benches as reserve driver with Renault before he found a competitive car to race in.  As their careers got underway in earnest with some building years for both driver and team where they both proved their immense talent, both then won back to back world championship with the same upstart team, in Schumi’s days as Benetton and in the Renault guise during Alonso’s reign, a team which despite some great periods of success has never truly managed to join the greats of the sport like Ferrari and Mclaren. A team which in both cases was managed by the most obnoxious man ever to grace F1 (tough Bernie, Ballestre and Mosley put up strong competition for this title) : Mankini Briatore.

Both won titles amidst allegations of some technical irregularities, Benetton for the traction control, and Renault for the mass dampers. At least Alonso did not have to barge anyone off the road to win his first title and the mass dampers were much less dodgy than the Bennetton’s fairly blatant cheating.
Both left the team after back to back world titles, and at both times the team’s performance tailed off in the following seasons. The following year both flirted with a third consecutive world title. The Ferrari’s bad reliability in the first half of the season hampered Schumi’s title charge in 96 in his first year with Ferrari, eventually finishing third in the WDC and unable to challenge the superior Williams consistently. Alonso was in with a serious shot for the title in 2007 with Mclaren but finished 3rd in the WDC as well after a tough year for driver and team.
Here is where the stories diverge a little. While Schumi stayed firmly put with the Scuderia in his quest to return the fledgling squad back to former glories, Alonso spent two years in the wilderness at his old team. Nonetheless, for both drivers their 2nd season after becoming double world champ was stained by scandals. 1997 saw Schumi lose the title to Villeneuve, which became a part of the dark side of Schumacher’s legacy  due to another one of his unsportsmanlike on-track moves in Jerez, while Alonso was in the eye of the storm in the Spygate affair already in 2007, but that was just peanuts compared to Crashgate in 2008 where Briatore ordered Nando’s teammate to crash in Singapore in order to trigger a safety car which would greatly help Nando to win the race.
In the third post-championship year, the stories are not very similar, except that both had overall quite disappointing years. Schumi had to contend with Mika Hakkinen snatching the title away from him, while Alonso was still trudging along in an uncompetitive Renault but their fourth post championship year saw the stories converge again. As Schumacher had done before him, Alonso now tied his fate to the Scuderia on a long term project to bring the team back to the top.

Again Schumacher narrowly missed out on the title against the flying Fin, while Alonso lost the title in the final race to one of the many German offspring Schumi’s F1 success had created. This all made me think that 2011 was surely going to be the year of Fernando Alonso and Ferrari, as it had been for Schumi 5 years after his second world title, but alas yet again Baby-Schumi spoiled the party for Nando.
While the timing may be a tad off, we can still consider the Vettel 2 year interlude much like Hakkinen’s back to back championships run in ’98 and ’99 which tempered Schumacher’s hopes for 2 years running. Perhaps 2012 will indeed be Nando’s time to join the elite club of triple world champions?
After all, Schumi did only win his third title aged 31, and guess which birthday Alonso will be celebrating in July next year?

  1. ninja90 says:

    Oh I so hope that’ll happen.
    Comparing Vettel with Hakkinen is a little off, although the Newey car kinda makes it right again.
    As a Alonso fan I kinda spun that story through my head a couple of times already and must say I’m not against Alonso becoming a four-times WDC if not more.

    Also I see you got the paragraphs working.

  2. Steve Bahn says:

    And Schumacher took his third title in his 5 season at Ferrari, so let see if Alonso will manage to do it as well.

    Alonso may have an edge in extracting overall performance over a year (except this year) but that has obviously not been enough.

    The conclusion may be that in spite of Alonso’s talent and skills on race track, he will never be as great Champion as Schumacher and Vettel if not something radical changes happens. Being part of a team is like being married, you are committed in good times and in bad times. Alonso seems though to lose his patience with the team in bad times and that is talking against him.
    The impression is that Alonso is far from the strong team builder as Schumacher was and that´s probably Alonso’s biggest Achilles heel.

    The benchmark in Felipe Massa is hard to evaluate. After 2004 Schumacher may have lost his motivation and killer instinct. In 2006 Felipe made it tough for him. Ferrari won the title 2007 with Raikkonen but Felipe was still hungry, he had an equal status as his team mate and a well-developed race car, he almost became a champion 2008. From 2009 there was a new rule set. From this point Ferrari lost its edge and did never really recover. What happened? When Alonso arrives in 2010 (the year after Felipe’s accident) he outclasses Felipe from day one. Did Felipe suffer psychologically all the time or was Alonso just that much faster?

    Well, it doesn´t matter because you don´t win 5 titles in a row on just pure performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s